ABSTRACT
Objetivo: verificar a acurácia do ultra-som transabdominal (USTA) em determinar as alteraçöes fisiológicas e patológicas do volume uterino e comparar o volume do útero ao USTA e ultra-som transvaginal (USTV), procurando verificar a relaçäo dos métodos. Métodos: inicialmente foram revistos, retrospectivamente, 1186 exames ecográficos pélvicos (USTA e USTV), verificando-se as principais doenças e indicaçöes para estes exames. A seguir, foram selecionados 480 USTA sem doenças uterinas e correlacionou-se o volume uterino com a idade e paridade. Finalmente, foi realizado estudo prospectivo comparando-se o volume uterino de 50 mulheres ao USTA e USTV. Para análise estatística utilizaram-se os testes t de Student e coeficientes de correlaçäo de Spearman e Pearson. Resultados: correlacionando-se com a paridade, para P=0 (n=99) o volume foi de 44,4 cmü; para P=1 (n=72) o volume foi 58,5 mü; para P=2-3 (n=137), o volume foi 75,8 cmü; para P=4-5 (n=56), 88 cmü e para P=6 ou mais (n=26), 105 cmü, mostrando uma correlaçäo positiva entre a paridade e o volume uterino. Com o coeficiente de correlaçäo de Spearman obtivera-se r=0,59 e p=0,001; o coeficiente de correlaçäo de Pearson foi r=0,55 e o mesmo p. Näo houve variaçöes significantes do volume uterino ao USTA e USTV. Conclusöes: o útero aumenta com a paridade e sofre alteraçöes do seu volume com a idade, sendo essas modificaçöes detectadas ao USTA. Ambos os métodos (USTA e USTV) säo equivalentes na medida do volume uterino; entretanto, a repleçäo vesical ao USTA permite melhor avaliaçäo do comprimento uterino.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Ultrasonography , Uterus , Abdomen , Uterus/physiology , Uterus/pathology , VaginaABSTRACT
To monitor the evolution of anastomoses performed on the distal colon in a situation of experimental peritonitis, 37 Wistar-Tecpar male rats a ged 114 to 130 days and weighing on average 298 g were divided into two lots: group S (control, N = 18) and group P (experimental, N = 19). P rats were submitted to laparotomy and peritonitis was induced by perforating the cecum with a needle, and S rats were only submitted to manipulation of the cecum. Twenty-four hours later the animals were resubmitted to laparotomy and distal colectomy was performed 1.5 cm distal to the peritoneal reflection. End-to-end anastomosis was performed on a single extramucosal plane using 8 separate stitches with 5-0 polypropylene sutures. The anastomoses were checked on the 3rd and 7th postoperative day. Upon opening the peritoneal cavity, the presence of alterations such as peritonitis or abscesses, adhesions, organs involved, fistulas or dehiscences was recorded. A 4.0 cm segment of the colon containing the anastomosis was resected and rupture pressure was measured. Epithelialization of the mucosal wound was evaluated and the material was studied histopathologically for inflammatory reaction and scar condition. Upon relaparotomy, peritonitis was detected in all P animals and fibrin was observed in the cavity of all animals. Adhesions were present in 2 groups, without significant differences between them. Mean rupture pressure was 108.7 mm Hg in group S and 112.0 mm Hg in group P on the 3rd day and 205.0 mm Hg in group S and 206.6 mm Hg in group P on the 7th day, with no significant difference between groups. Microscopic evolution was similar in the two groups. These results permit us to conclude that peritonitis induced by this method does not modify the healing process of distal colon anastomoses in rats.